Birch v Birch

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1902
Year1902
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
56 cases
  • Chee Seng & Company Sdn Bhd; Seng Huat Hang Sdn Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1987
  • Poraviappan s/o Arunasalam Pillay v Periasamy s/o Sithambaram Pillai
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Kelly v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 January 1986
    ...814) in that it is "somaterial as to make it reasonably probable that the action willsucceed" (per Vaughan Williams LJ in Birch .v. Birch( 1902 P 130 at 136-137) and it must be credible, that is, "well capable of belief in the context of the circumstances as a whole, including the other evi......
  • Balber Kaur Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 May 2015
    ...has to be such as could not have been reasonably discovered by the time of the trial. Nor is any such suggestion to be found in Birch v Birch [1902] P 130, a Court of Appeal case in which Boswell v Coaks (No. 2) was cited. 32 Likewise, it seems to me that Phosphate Sewage Co Ltd v Molleson,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT