Bisset v Wilkinson
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1927 |
| Date | 1927 |
| Year | 1927 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
69 cases
-
Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Mardon
...Sufficient that it was intended to be acted upon and was in fact acted on". 16 Mr. Ross-Munro, Q.C., retaliated, however, by citing Bisset v. Wilkinson (1927) Appeal Cases 177, when the Privy Council said that a statement by a New Zealand farmer that an area of land "would carry 2,000 sheep......
-
Dodds v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd
...Hollyman, above n 9, at [5.2.3]. 11 Savill v NZI Finance [1990] 3 NZLR 135 (CA); Shen v Ossyanin, above n 9, at [16]; Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177 (PC) at 183; Magee v Mason [2017] NZCA 502, (2017) 18 NZCPR 902 at 12 Walsh v Kerr [1987] 2 NZLR 166 (HC) at 172; Hollyman, above n 9, at [......
-
John Corbitt Barnsley and Others v Philip Noble
...objective assessment of the tenant's history of paying. The actual result therefore is not surprising. 208 Mr Tager also referred me to Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177 as an illustration of a case where a statement was held to be a statement of opinion pure and simple with no implication o......
- Thomas Witter Ltd v T.B.P. Industries Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Misrepresentation
...intention. If a false statement of present intention is made either intentionally or carelessly, the statement is 12 Bisset v Wilkinson , [1927] AC 177 (PC). And see, for example, Trethewey v Girard (1983), 149 DLR (3d) 359 (BCSC) (private seller of boat represented to be sound). 13 See, fo......
-
Statements of Fact and Statements of Belief in Insurance Contract Law and General Contract Law
...be interpreted as holding either that the landlords’statements were, on their true interpretation, factual and wrong, or that they were2 [1927] AC 177.3Edgington vFitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459.4Bissett vWilkinson [1927] AC 177, 182.5 (1884) 28 Ch D 7.6 [1958] Ch 636.7 (1884) 28 Ch D 7, 15.......
-
MISDESCRIPTION AND MISREPRESENTATION LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF ART AUCTIONS IN NEW ZEALAND.
...the relevant United Kingdom legislation. See the Misrepresentation Act 1967, s. 3. (70) (accessed 27 May 2020). (71) Bisset v. Wilkinson [1927] A.C. 177 (P.C.) is long standing authority of some eminence on this (72) In Harlingdon & Leinster v. Christopher Hull Fine Art Ltd [1991] 1 Q.B......