Blazer Plc v Yardley & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
An Post v Irish Permanent Plc
...PLC & ANOR V PHILIP MORRIS LTD & ANOR 1984 RPC 293 FINANCIAL TIMES LTD V EVENING STANDARD CO LTD 1991 FSR 7 GLAZOR PLC V YARDLEY & CO LTD 1992 FSR 501 ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHING PLC V REDWOOD PUBLISHING LTD 1993 FSR 449 FORTNUM MASON PLC V FORTNUM LTD 1994 FSR 438 VON HAYTER MOTOR UNDERWRI......
-
Future Publishing Ltd v The Edge Interactive Media Inc. and Others
... ... associated with the product is being used and eroded by the actions of the defendant: see Blazer v. Yardley [1992] FSR 501 at 509–10, BT v. One in a Million at 23 and Irvine v. Talksport ... I would need cogent supporting evidence to convince me that this company is EIM's licensee and no such evidence has been forthcoming. In any event it is doubtful whether ... ...
-
Harbour Fit Industrial Ltd. v Leon Kotan Kwai Garden Seafood Restaurant Ltd.
...being refused because an injunction would, as a practical matter, dispose of the action. The clearest example is that in Blazer v Yardley [1992] FSR 501. 26. Ms. Tam acknowledged that had the injunction been sought either immediately before the defendant began trading under the Tan Gwai Hin......
-
Ate Unique Transportation Ltd. And Others v Ate Air Tiger Express Co. Ltd. And Others
...being refused because an injunction would, as a practical matter, dispose of the action. The clearest example is that in Blazer v Yardley [1992] FSR 501. That was a case where a name was being used by a company which had no previous association with the name, and there was no relationship b......
Get Started for Free