Bloxam v Favre
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1882 |
| Date | 1882 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
BHP Group Ltd v Impiombato
...363. 30 Kempe, Maxwell on the Interpretation of Statutes, 3rd ed (1896) at 200. 31 (1932) 48 CLR 391 at 423-424, quoting Bloxam v Favre (1883) 8 PD 101 at 107, adopting Maxwell on 32 (1932) 48 CLR 391 at 424. To similar effect, see Re Maritime Union of Australia; Ex parte CSL Pacific Shippi......
- Polites v Commonwealth Kandiliotes v Commonwealth
-
Minister of National Revenue v. Seaboard Lumber Sales Co., (1994) 74 F.T.R. 231 (TD)
...National Railway Co. and Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Canada (1993), 62 F.T.R. 150 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 4, footnote 4]. Bloxam v. Favre (1883), 8 P.D. 101 (H.C.J., Prob. Div.), affd. (1884), 9 P.D. 130 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8, footnote Salomon v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [1967]......
-
Kandiliotes v Commonwealth of Australia; Polites v Commonwealth of Australia
...for which the plaintiffs contend is well established by many authorities. Perhaps it is most conveniently stated in Bloxam v. FavreELR (1883), 8 P.D. 101, at p. 107, where Sir James Hannen approved the statement in Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, 8th ed. (1937), p. 130, that ‘every s......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Blackburn v. Attorney-General [1971] 1 WLR 1037 (CA) ................................123 Bloxam v. Favre (1883) 8 PD 101 (CA) ..........................................137–38, 171, 176 Bremer v. Freeman (1857) 10 Moo PC 306, 14 ER 508 (PC) ..............................63 Buvot v. Barbuit (......