Boarland (Inspector of Taxes) v Kramat Pulai Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date15 October 1953
Date15 October 1953
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Morgan v Tate & Lyle Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 June 1954
    ...bring the payment in question within that description." 34 The Crown also called in aid the recent decision of Danckwerts, J. in Boarland v. Kramat Pulai Ltd. [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1332, but I do not find that case of any assistance, as the learned Judge took the view that the expenditure in que......
  • Morgan v Tate & Lyle Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 1 June 1954
    ...within that description. The Crown also called in aid the recent decision of Danckwerts, J., inBoarland v. Kramat Pulai, Ltd.(1), [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1332, but I do not find that case of any assistance, as the learned Judge took the view that the expenditure in question had two objects, one of ......
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Pick 'n Pay Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Respondent's purposes and motivations coincided and the two A cannot be distinguished in this case. (See eg Boarland v Kramat Pulai [1953] 2 All ER 1122 (Ch) at 1129D - F; Nemojim's case supra at 947H - 948C; and cf De Beers Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1986 (1) SA 8......
  • Thompson v Sons Ltd v Chamberlain
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free