Bolch v Chipman

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Year2003
Date2003
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
116 cases
  • Deman vs Association of University,Duncan Mercer,Richard Jay,Max Goldstrom,Paul Hudson
    • United Kingdom
    • Fair Employment Tribunal (NI)
    • 21 de março de 2008
    ...Law (“Harvey”) Volume 5 at T647ff and in particular to paragraph 653 where, referring to Burton J’s judgement in Bolch –v- Chipman 2004 IRLR 140 EAT, and taking account of the judgements in Bennett –v- London Borough of Southwark 2002 EWCA Civ 223 and De Keyser Ltd –v- Wilson 2001 IRLR 324 ......
  • Mr A G Badita v Mo Sys Engineering Ltd and others: 3203935/2022
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 6 de dezembro de 2022
    ...see Deman v Commission for Equality and Human Rights [2010] EWCA Civ 1279 per Sedley LJ at para 19. Conduct 51. In Bolch v Chipman [2004] IRLR 140, EAT It was suggested that the ordinary approach to the question of whether a claim should be struck out is to address the following 51.1. wheth......
  • Mr N Romney v BUPA Insurance Services Ltd: 2414434/2021 and 2205507/2022
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 10 de novembro de 2023
    ...the conclusion reached is that a fair trial is no longer possible. We would need to look at the factors set out in Bolch v Chipman [2004] IRLR 140. We would look to see whether there has been unreasonable, vexatious, or scandalous behaviour and look at the appropriate remedy for that behavi......
  • Abegaze v Shrewsbury College of Arts & Technology
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 de fevereiro de 2009
    ...be derived from Blockbuster Entertainments Limited v James [2006] IRLR 630 (CA); Arrow Nominees v Blackledge [2001] BCC 591 (CA); and Bolch v Chipman [2004] IRLR 140 (EAT). 17 The strike out for failing actively to pursue the case raises some different considerations. In Evans Executors v M......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT