Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1993
Date1993
Year1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
84 cases
  • Birch v University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 29 September 2008
    ... ... Despite a paucity of authority my view is that in the special circumstances of Mrs Birch's ... As Lord Browne-Wilkinson put it in Bolitho v City of Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232, 243C: ... ...
  • Lillywhite v University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 December 2005
    ... ... referred to Penny Palmer and Cannon v The East Kent Health Authority [2000] PNLR 323 , considered that the general ... Regional Labour Party [1984] 1 WLR 634 and Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 were ... ...
  • Boustead v North West Strategic Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 16 June 2008
    ... ... Belinda Murray) Claimant and North West Strategic Health Authority[city Maternity Hospital Carlisle] Defendant ... Ms E.A. Gumbel QC and Mr H.J. Witcomb ... men skilled in that particular art” In the House of Lords' judgment in Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 at 241H Lord Browne – Wilkinson said:— ... ...
  • JU and Another v See Tho Kai Yin
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 8 August 2005
    ... ...  Chang handled women’s rights, maternal and infant health care matters as a family law specialist. However, she did a ... Bolam test was confirmed by the House of Lords in Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Doctors Are Aggrieved—Should They Be? Gross Negligence Manslaughter and the Culpable Doctor
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 84-4, August 2020
    • 1 August 2020
    ...Bolitho (n 106) at 1160.130. Lodge (n 31) at 128.131. Hucks v Cole [1993] 4 Med LR 393 at 397.132. Bolitho v City of Hackney HA [1993] 4 Med LR 381 at 392.133. Associated Provincial v Wednesbury (n 106).134. Teff, ‘The Standard of Care in Medical Negligence—Moving on From Bolam’ 18 Oxf J Le......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT