Boodram v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
55 cases
-
Ramcharran v Commissioner of Correctional Services and DPP and another
... ... Patrick Foster, Dep. Solicitor General & Miss Annaliesa Lindsay Director of State Proceedings ... Cooley, Special Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, sworn to on 19 th ... referred to Lord Mustil's words in Nankissoon Boodram v Attorney General and Another [1996] 47 WIR 459 at 495 ... Miami area using Air Jamaica Airlines Flights via Trinidad to Miami, Florida. During this time, Donovan WILLIAMS would ... ...
-
Omar Anderson v R
...v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago [1981] 1 ALL ER 244 and Boodram v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago and another [1996] AC 842. Having considered those cases, the Board held that the appellant had been deprived of his liberty after a fair and proper trial under due process o......
-
The Hon Mrs Portia Simpson-Miller and Others v Attorney-General and DPP
...Their Lordships in Clinton Forbes, after citing Chokolingo v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago [1981] WLR 106; Boodram v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago [1966] A.C. 842; and Hinds v Attorney-General of Barbados [2002] 2 WLR 470, declared at paragraph 18 of the judgment: ‘Thei......
- Peters and Another v Attorney General and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Constitutional damages, procedural due process and the Maharaj legacy : a comparative review of recent Commonwealth decisions (part 1)
...statute. Rather itinvokes the concept of the rule of law itself and the universally accepted30See Okpaluba and Osode (n 25) para 17.3.31[1996] AC 842 (PC).32(N 2) 854.33(1971) 18 WIR 379 (T&T CA).34[2000] 2 AC 1 Constitutional damages, procedural due process and the Maharaj legacy 263standa......