Book review: D Short, Redefining Genocide: Settler Colonialism, Social Death and Ecocide

AuthorTanya Wyatt
DOI10.1177/1362480616671094
Published date01 February 2017
Date01 February 2017
Subject MatterBook reviews
/tmp/tmp-18qGmbZQseYkgv/input Book reviews
101
References
Abu-Laban Y (2015) Gendering surveillance studies: The empirical and normative promise of
feminist methodology. Surveillance & Society 13(1): 44–56.
Ball KS, Phillips DJ, Green N and Koskela H (2009) Surveillance studies needs gender and sexual-
ity. Surveillance & Society 6(4): 352–355.
Koskela H (2012) You shouldn’t wear that body: The problematic of surveillance and gender. In:
Ball K, Haggerty KD and Lyon D (eds) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. New
York: Routledge International Handbook, 49–56.
Mason CL and Magnet S (2012) Surveillance studies and violence against women. Surveillance
& Society 10(2): 105–118.
D Short, Redefining Genocide: Settler Colonialism, Social Death and Ecocide, New York: Zed Books,
2016; 224 pp.: 9781842779316, £19.99 (pbk)
Reviewed by: Tanya Wyatt, Northumbria University, UK
Redefining Genocide is an ambitious attempt to challenge the status quo in genocide stud-
ies. Drawing on the main author of the UN Genocide Convention, Raphael Lemkin (who
coined the word genocide), along with indigenous studies, environmental justice and
green criminology, Short makes a compelling case for expanding the definition of geno-
cide. He does so by providing not only a strong theoretical argument as the opening to his
book, but also by including four original well-researched and well-crafted case studies as
evidence (three of these real-life case studies are co-authored with area experts).
The introduction to Redefining Genocide is a succinct accessible account of the evolu-
tion of the existing UN Genocide Convention. Short expertly summarizes a long compli-
cated negotiation process that resulted in genocide essentially only being recognized
when there are mass killings. Chapter 1, ‘Definitional conundrums: A sociological
approach to genocide’, explores the limitations of this definition. A definition of geno-
cide that only acknowledges physical genocide ignores other genocidal actions. Lemkin
(and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT