Booth v Briscoe
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1876 |
| Year | 1876 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
William Peddie, James Kerr, and George La Grue v Samuel Kyle
...persons, they cannot be joined as plaintiffs in one action of libel. Smurthwaite v. Hannay ([1894] A. C. 494) followed; Booth v. Briscoe (2 Q. B. D. 496) considered and explained. Motion on behalf of the defendant that all further proceedings be stayed, and the action dismissed, on the grou......
-
Koh Sin Chong Freddie v Chan Cheng Wah Bernard
...[1964] AC 371 (folld) Au Yee Ming Ivan v Ng Fei Tip [2010] HKEC 1319 (refd) Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269 (folld) Booth v Briscoe (1877) 2 QBD 496 (folld) Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc [2011] 1 SCR 214 (distd) Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, Inc 445 NYS (2 d) 786 (refd) Brien v......
-
Dawson v M'Clelland and Others
...Division, before SIR P. O'BRIEN, L.C.J., and ANDREWS and BOYD, JJ. (1898. No. 2491.) DAWSON and M'CLELLAND AND OTHERS Booth v. BriscoeELR 2 Q. B. D. 496. Brown v. AllenENR 4 Esp. 158. Clarke v. NewsamENR 1 Ex. 131, 140. Cocke v. JennerENR Hob. 66. Colledge v. PikeUNK 56 L. T. (N. S.) 124. E......
-
Goodall v Hoogendoorn Ltd
...v Prema (1910 T.P.D. 101 at p. 104). The position was the same in England till the promulgation of Order XVI, Rule 1. See Booth v Briscoe (2 Q.B.D. 496). This principle is applicable to a partnership and a fortiori to a company. See Lindley on Partnership (8th ed.), p. 335-6; South Hetton C......
Request a trial to view additional results