Bourke v Davis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1889 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
- Haji Yahya Lampang, Re; ex parte Sabah Development Bank Bhd
-
Rowland v Environment Agency
...prescriptive user. Prior to that date PRN did not exist over tributaries of the Thames where there was no such prescriptive user (see Bourke v. Davis (1899) 44 Ch D 110) and parts of the Thames had been closed off. Accordingly section 1 was apt to extend PRN over channels over which no PRN ......
-
Attorney General, ex rel Yorkshire Derwent Trust Ltd and Another v Brotherton and Others
...& E. 314 (at p. 329) that the channel of a public navigable river is a King's highway to the description by Kay J. in Bourke v. Davis (1889) 44 Ch.D. 110 (at p. 120), (particularly significant perhaps in the light of the terms of subsection (8)) of the claim in that case as "similar to a ri......
-
Paddico (267) Ltd v (1) Kirklees Metropolitan Council and Others
...that I ought to consider the point concluded by authority". Having referred to the old cases of Fitch v. Rawling (1795) 2 H. Bl. 93, and Bourke v. Davis (1890) 44 Ch D 110 (where Kay J considered that a custom might be confined to the inhabitants of a district), Kekewich J rejected the atte......
Request a trial to view additional results