Bowker v Rose (unreported)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1978 |
| Year | 1978 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Hodgson and Others v Trapp and Another
...Social Security Act 1975. He rightly held himself bound to disregard those allowances pursuant to the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Bowker v. Rose, The Times, 3 February 1978, Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Transcript No. 164 of 1978, C.A., and Gohery v. Durham County Council, (Unre......
-
McCamley v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd
...attendance and mobility allowances following on the decision of the House of Lords in Hodgson -v- Trapp [1988] 3 A.E.R. 870 overruling Bowker -v- Rose [1978] 122 S.J. 147. 8 THE AWARD OF £85,000 9 Both parties accept that in March 1988 £85,000 would have been an appropriate assessment for a......
-
Nabi v British Leyland (U.K.) Ltd
...v. Downs - (1970) 1 Queen's Bench, pg. 73, (State retirement pension), Daish v. Waunton, (Maintenance under the National Health Service), Bowker v. Rose (unreported), decided by this Court on 2nd February 1978 (Mobility allowance and attendance allowance). So ran the argument of the appella......
-
Lincoln v Hayman
...could not claim as special damage the cost of his free support in an Institution, since it is not an expense that he had incurred. And in Bowker—v—Rose Lord Justice Megaw said that attendance and mobility allowances were more akin to benefits in kind under the National Health Service legisl......