Boyce v Paddington Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1903 |
| Year | 1903 |
| Date | 1903 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
112 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
An evaluation of the administrative law role of the Queensland Planning and Environment Court
...the person restricted by showing special damages according to the restrictions previously imposed by Boyce v Paddington Borough Council (1903) 1 Ch. 109 at 134. The section recognises the recent trend towards more frequently recognising plaintiffs or applicants having Locos Standi no matter......
10 books & journal articles
-
Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
...Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372. If a fiat is not granted it may be necessary to establish a 'special loss': see Boyce v Paddington BC [1903] 1 Ch 109; Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672, 680; Bateman's Bay Local Aboriginal Land Council v Aboriginal Community Benefit F......
-
The Evolution and Reform of Standing in Australian Administrative Law
...Gummow J in Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd (2000) 200 CLR 591, 626–8 [88]–[100]. 30 [1903] 1 Ch 109 (‘Boyce’). The criteria of Buckley LJ was endorsed by the House of Lords in London Passenger Transport Board v Moscrop [1942] AC 332, 342. ......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...being challenged. 1.97 Tun Salleh Abas LP approved the decision of Buckley J in the English case of Boyce v Paddington Borough Council[1903] 1 Ch 109 at 114. This identified two instances where a plaintiff could sue in a public law case without joining the Attorney-General: first, where an ......
-
Procedure and Remedies in Judicial Review: A Malaysian Perspective
...leading cases in Malaysian public law illustrate this. In the first passagethe court said:11The first limb of the exposition in Boyce ([1903] 1 Ch 109, 114) simply meansthat the availability of injunctions and declarations at the instance of anindividual to protect private rights is not d......
Get Started for Free