Boyce v Rendells
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1983 |
Year | 1983 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Mr Richard Gabriel (Appellant/Claimant) v Mr Peter Little and Another (Respondents/Defendants) Whiteshore Associates Ltd (2ndRespondents/Defendants) BPE Solicitors (3rdRespondents/Defendants)
...different to that which he believed that he was entering into and of obvious risks that arose as a consequence: Boyce v Rendells [1983] 2 EGLR 146 per Lawton LJ at 149H; Pickersgill v Riley [2004] UKPC 14, [2004] PNLR 31 per Lord Scott of Foscote at para. 7; Credit Lyonnais SA v Russell Jon......
-
Mason v Mills & Reeve (A Firm)
...duty extends to advising upon matters that lie beyond the express instructions he has been given by his client. As Lawton LJ accepted in Boyce v Rendells [1983] 2 EGLR 146 at 149H: "… if, in the course of taking instructions, a professional man like a land agent or a solicitor learns of fac......
-
AW Group Ltd v Taylor Walton (A Firm)
...was his duty to inform the client. 167 At paragraph 23 Mr Justice Laddie cited from the judgment of Lord Justice Lawton in the case of Boyce v Rendells (1983) 268 EG 268: "…if in the course of taking instructions, a professional man like a land agent or a solicitor learns of facts which rev......
-
Bentleys Stokes & Loweless v Eagle Major Ltd
...would have clearly understood what was going on. 54 At this stage however, it seems to me based on the decisions of Boyce v Rendells [1983] 268 EG 268County Personnel Ltd v Alan R Pulver & Co [1987] 1 WLR 916 that the warnings might have not been clearly considered. 55.Thereafter the partie......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF LAWYERS for THEIR CLIENTS' MISSTATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS TO THE SECURITIES MARKET IN SINGAPORE
...2013). 43 See, eg, Moody v Cox[1917] 2 Ch 71 at 91, per Scrutton LJ; Spector v Ageda[1973] Ch 30 at 48, per Megarry J; Boyce v Rendells(1983) 268 EG 268 at 272, per Lawton LJ. 44 See Hilton v Barker Booth & Eastwood[2005] 1 WLR 567 (information learnt in the course of acting for another ret......