Braddock and Other v Bevins and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1948 |
| Year | 1948 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Plummer v Charman
... ... conceivably say: "I am an elector; I made a communication to the other electors on a matter of common interest to us in such circumstances that ... stand and I see no reason why the defendants should be given yet another chance of seeing if they can concoct some further ground Which would not ... ...
-
Tan Chor Chuan and Others v Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth and Others
...not to support the requisitionists is purely incidental even if such result might be viewed as being likely. Indeed, Braddock v Bevins [1948] 1 KB 580 (a case not cited by the parties) is authority for the proposition that the privilege is not lost to a candidate in an election because he m......
-
Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd. et al., (1999) 250 N.R. 1 (HL)
...2 Q.B. 535, refd to. [para. 22]. Blackshaw v. Lord, [1984] Q.B. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 23, 76, 114, 172]. Braddock v. Bevins, [1948] 1 K.B. 580 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 24, 114, Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd. et al., [1993] A.C. 534; 150 N.R. 69 (H.L.), refd to. [par......
- Large v Atkinson
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Lange and Reynolds qualified privilege: Australian and English defamation law and practice.
...1050 (Parke B). (26) Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309, 334 (Lord Atkinson). (27) Chapman v Ellesmere [1932] 2 KB 431. (28) Braddock v Bevins [1948] 1 KB 580. The media might be able to rely on an ancillary or derivative protection, for example, if it published one person's reply to an attack by (2......
-
Constitutional Words About Words: Protected Speech and "Fighting Words" Under the Australian and American Constitutions
...note 95, at 26-30. [97] Coleman v. MacLennan, 98 P. 281 (Kan. 1908); see LOVELAND, supra note 95 at 37-41. [98] Braddock v. Bevins, [1948] 1 All E.R. 450 (C.A.) (Eng.); see LOVELAND, supra note 95, at 52-54. [99] Perera v. Peiris, [1949] A.C. 1 (U.K.); see LOVELAND, supra note 95, at 55-56.......
-
Defaming Politicians: The Not So Common Law
...Hallam University.1Toogood vSpyring (1834) 1 C M & R 181,193 per Parke B.2 See Blackshaw vLord [1984] 1 QB 1.3 See Braddock vBevins [1948] 1 KB 580 (communication by an elector to other electors in the sameward, but not to all the world, privileged). The effect of this decision was reversed......