Bradlaugh v Gossett

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1883
Year1883
Date1883
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
65 cases
  • Lim Guan Eng v PP
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Jeyaretnam JB v Attorney General
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 15 December 1988
    ......Lord Coleridge CJ said in Bradlaugh v Gossett (1884) 12 QBD 271 at p 275: . . .. What is said or done within the walls of Parliament cannot be inquired into in a court ......
  • S Sivadas; Times Publishing Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1988
  • Jeyaretnam JB v Attorney General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 September 1987
    ......Whatever matter arises concerning Parliament ought to be examined, discussed or adjudicated in Parliament and not elsewhere.In Bradlaugh v Gossett [1884] 12 QBD 271, the plaintiff, Charles Bradlaugh, was elected a member of Parliament in May 1883. He was not allowed to take the oath ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT