Brend v Wood
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Year | 1946 |
| Date | 1946 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
- Lim Chin Aik v R
-
Harding v Price
... ... The general rule applicable to criminal cases is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, and I venture to repeat what I said in Brend v. Wood F11 : “It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind that, unless ... ...
-
S v Coetzee and Others
...rule applicable to criminal cases is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, and I venture to repeat what I said in Brend v Wood [(1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463]: "It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind that, unless ......
-
Charles v Skeete
...and statutory instruments such as clause 14(1). In Brend v. Wood, Lord Goddard, C.J. followed this identical approach when he said [ (1946) 175 L.T. 306, at p. 307]:– “It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind tha......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
A critique on privately prosecuting the holder of ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations: Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
...Strafreg 4 ed (1985) 103.90 Ibid para 166 with refer ence to English case s of Harding v Price [1948] 1 KB 695 at 700 and Brend v Wood (1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463.91 J R Midgley ‘Delict’ in J A Fa ris (ed) The L aw of South Afr ica vol 15 (3 ed) (2016) para 31. © Juta and Company (Pty) PRIVATE......
-
A critique on privately prosecuting the holder of ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations: Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
...Strafreg 4 ed (1985) 103.90 Ibid para 166 with refer ence to English case s of Harding v Price [1948] 1 KB 695 at 700 and Brend v Wood (1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463.91 J R Midgley ‘Delict’ in J A Fa ris (ed) The L aw of South Afr ica vol 15 (3 ed) (2016) para 31. © Juta and Company (Pty) PRIVATE......
