Brend v Wood
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1946 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
Charles v Skeete
...and statutory instruments such as clause 14(1). In Brend v. Wood, Lord Goddard, C.J. followed this identical approach when he said [ (1946) 175 L.T. 306, at p. 307]:– “It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind tha......
-
S v Coetzee and Others
...rule applicable to criminal cases is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, and I venture to repeat what I said in Brend v Wood [(1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463]: "It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind that, unless ......
-
S v Coetzee and Others
...rule applicable to criminal cases is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, and I venture to repeat what I said in Brend v Wood [(1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463]: "It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind that, unless ......
-
S v Coetzee and Others
...rule applicable to criminal cases is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, and I venture to repeat what I said in Brend v Wood [(1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463]: "It is of the utmost importance for the protection of the liberty of the subject that a court should always bear in mind that, unless ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT FAULT
...remains that a person who committed an offence of absolute liability will be punished even if it was done by mistake or by accident. 51 (1946) 62 TLR 462. 52 Brend v Wood (1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463. 53 He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523 at 568. 54 [2000] 2 AC 428. 55 B (a minor) v Dire......
-
A critique on privately prosecuting the holder of ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations: Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
...Strafreg 4 ed (1985) 103.90 Ibid para 166 with refer ence to English case s of Harding v Price [1948] 1 KB 695 at 700 and Brend v Wood (1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463.91 J R Midgley ‘Delict’ in J A Fa ris (ed) The L aw of South Afr ica vol 15 (3 ed) (2016) para 31. © Juta and Company (Pty) PRIVATE......
-
A critique on privately prosecuting the holder of ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations: Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
...Strafreg 4 ed (1985) 103.90 Ibid para 166 with refer ence to English case s of Harding v Price [1948] 1 KB 695 at 700 and Brend v Wood (1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463.91 J R Midgley ‘Delict’ in J A Fa ris (ed) The L aw of South Afr ica vol 15 (3 ed) (2016) para 31. © Juta and Company (Pty) PRIVATE......