Brennan and Others v Sunderland City Council and Others
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] UKEAT 0349_08_1612,UKEAT/349/08 |
| Date | 2008 |
| Year | 2008 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
-
R (on the application of the Secretary of State for the Home Department) v First-Tier Tribunal (IAC) (Litigation privilege; First-Tier Tribunal)
... [1981] 1 WLR 529. The underlying principle is one of fairness to prevent ‘cherry picking’: see e.g. Brennan v Sunderland City Council [2009] ICR 479, 483–4 at [16]. iii) Similarly, a party who by suing its legal advisor puts their confidential relationship in issue cannot claim privilege i......
-
Mr G Imrie v Right Track Scotland Ltd: 4107299/2014
...was not a disposal by informal agreement where matters of waiver of privilege may arise, as seen in Brennan v Sunderland City Council [2009] ICR 479 (Brennan). Those matters which were the subject of the Court action have been resolved by the decree of That includes the aspects of loss inju......
-
Faithorn Farrell Timms LLP v Mrs S Bailey
...had waived privilege. Waiver was to be determined objectively; the underlying principle was fairness (Brennan v Sunderland City Council [2009] ICR 479 EAT): a party could not partially waive privilege (Paragon Finance plc v Freshfields [1999] 1 WLR 1183 CA). Given the underlying nature of t......
-
Tetiana Ieremeieva v Sergii Lagur
...allow cherrypicking, but the question is when has a cherry been relevantly placed before the court.” ( Brennan v Sunderland City Council [2009] ICR 479, at [63]).” 189 The claimants urge that waiver is not easily established and a degree of reliance is required, applying dicta in Brennan at......
Request a trial to view additional results