Brexit and Scots Law: Policing and Criminal Justice

DOI10.3366/elr.2018.0465
Published date01 January 2018
Author
Date01 January 2018
Pages138-144
INTRODUCTION

Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (“PJCCM”) is a key dimension of Brexit. Fighting crime is an example of where co-operation amongst member states has proved particularly successful, with many instruments adopted by the European Union (“EU”) over the years. The United Kingdom's (“UK”) participation in this area of law has been far from linear, with it enjoying a privileged regime of opt-ins and opt-outs. However, the benefits of this close cooperation for both the UK1 and the EU2 are undeniable, so the future of security strategies in the context of the UK's departure from the EU is a political priority for both sides. The UK's variable position already presents a complicated picture, but when this is mapped on to the domestic constitutional structure, the landscape is ever more complex. While issues like international relations and security are within the competence of the Westminster Parliament3, criminal justice (including policing) and aspects of criminal law are devolved matters. Therefore, the question arises as to what the specific role for Scotland in this area will be in light of Brexit.

In a paper expressing its Brexit negotiating position on security and law enforcement, the UK Government identified three main priorities: continued cooperation to facilitate data-driven law enforcement, through the use of shared databases;4 practical assistance for cross-border law enforcement operations;5 and cooperation through the EU's specialised agencies, such as Eurojust and Europol. It also stressed the importance of working closely “where justice and policing are devolved […] as negotiations progress on the UK's new partnership with the EU”.6 The UK Government has frequently repeated its broad commitment to sustaining the closest possible cooperation with the EU in tackling terrorism, organised crime and other threats to security now and into the future, suggesting, surely correctly, that it is in the clear interest of UK and EU citizens to do so.

To understand the potential role for Scotland in the future of PJCCM after Brexit, the peculiar position of the UK in relation to this area of EU law is first outlined. Then in Section C, the impact of Brexit on UK – and Scotland especially – in relation to criminal justice will be addressed first, by outlining how EU law obligations map (messily) on to the UK, thereby encouraging legal and operational co-operation north and south of the border and second, by reflecting on the impact of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (“the Bill”) should it be adopted in its current form. Finally, possible scenarios will be outlined as to how inter-state cooperation in police and criminal justice between the UK and the EU might operate after Brexit. Scotland's role here would be to feed its preferred options into the UK negotiating line.

THE UK PLACE IN EU POLICE AND JUDICIAL COOPERATION

The provisions concerning PJJCM are included in Chapters 4 and 5, Title V (devoted to the Area of Freedom Security and Justice, or “AFSJ”) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).7

On the basis of these provisions, and the corresponding ones in previous Treaties, the EU has adopted many instruments, mainly in the following areas: approximation of rules of substantive and procedural criminal law;8 instruments of mutual recognition, according to which a judicial order issued by member state (“MS”) A and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT