Brice v Brown

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1984
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Hevican v Ruane
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Page v. Smith, (1995) 182 N.R. 321 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 11 May 1995
    ...Steamship Co. Pty. Ltd. Polemis and Furness Withy & Co., Re, [1921] 3 K.B. 560 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 97]. Brice v. Brown, [1984] 1 All E.R. 997, consd. [para. Statutes Noticed: Fatal Accidents Act, 1846 (U.K.), c. 93, generally [para. 87]. Limitation Act, 1980 (U.K.), sect. 38(1) [par......
  • Page v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 May 1995
    ...test is most apparent in those cases such as Schneider v. Eisovitch [1962] Q.B. 430, Malcolm v. Broadhurst [1970] 3 All E.R. 508 and Brice v. Brown [1984] 1 All E.R. 997, where the plaintiff is both primary and secondary victim of the same accident. 105 Applying that test in the present cas......
  • White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 3 December 1998
    ...to the plaintiff. Only once this has been proved is the defendant bound to take the victim as he or she finds him or her." 43See, e.g., Brice v. Brown [1984] 1 All E.R. 997. It is right that I should record the doubts on this point expressed by Mr. Tony Weir in his review of Mullany and Ha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT