Brickles v Snell
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1916 |
| Year | 1916 |
| Date | 1916 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 cases
-
Lyra Sewer Collazo Appellant v Percival Williams Respondent
...would not grant the remedy of specific performance where this condition has not been met. Steedman v Drinkle [1916] 1 AC 275 ,279 and Brickles v Snell [1916] 2 AC 599 applied (5) The courts will not imply a term into a contract for sale of land that completion was conditional upon the pu......
-
J.T.M. Construction and Equipment Ltd v Circle B Farms Ltd
...served with the notice or the party serving it if he fails to complete by the new date: (See: Stickney v Keeble [1917] A.C. 386 and Brickies v Snell [1916] 2 A.C.599) 51 Now, turning to the facts of this case, it can be seen that following on the failure of the claimant to return the execu......
-
Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi
...as late as 1914 in Stickney v Keeble 139. However, there then intruded two decisions of the Privy Council in Steedman v Drinkle 140 and Brickles v Snell 141. Those decisions appeared to stand for the proposition that specific performance by way of equitable relief against forfeiture is neve......
- Legione v Hateley
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
...(Hwang JC), Yang Min Jian v Koh Lian Chye (unreported, 13 Jun 1996, Prakash J). 101 Steedman v Drinkle [1916] 1 AC 275, Brickles v Snell[1916] 2 AC 599. This was once also the approach in England, see Lord Wilberforce in Shiloh Spinners v Harding[1973] AC 691 at 723; Lord Simon at 726, but ......