British Nylon Spinners Ltd v I. C. I. Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1952 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Midland Bank Plc v Laker Airways Ltd
...is a matter on which different views can be held, and I notice that in British Nylon Spinners Ltd. v. Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. (1953) Ch. 19 at page 28 Denning L.J. (as he then was) said tersely: "The writ of the United States does not run in this country, and, if due regard is ha......
-
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International UK Ltd and Others (No. 2)
...not invoke the jurisdiction of the English court for the protection of their own rights—as in British Nylon Spinners Ltd. v. I.C.I. Ltd. [1953] Ch. 19—the foreign court is free to achieve its objectives by making orders in personam against persons who are subject to its jurisdiction.” 111 ......
-
Derby & Company Ltd v Weldon (No. 6)
...do not invoke the jurisdiction of the English court for the protection of their own rights (as in British Nylon Spinners Ltd. v. I.C.I. [1953] CH 19) the foreign court is free to achieve its objectives by making orders in personam against persons who are subject to its 36In my judgment, th......
- X AG and Others v A Bank
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Guide To Obtaining Evidence In England For Use In Proceedings In The United States Of America
...by a bank to its customers. Leggatt J. referred to the case of British Nylon Spinners Limited v. Imperial Chemical Industries Limited [1952] 2 All ER 780 quoted the passage. The Courts of this Country will, in the natural course, pay great respect and attention to the Superior Court of the ......
2 books & journal articles
-
CONTEMPT ORDERS AND JUDICIAL “ATTACHMENT” OF EQUITABLE PROPERTY
...courts will pay no regard to such laws”. See Romer LJ's remarks arguendo in British Nylon Spinners Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd[1953] 1 Ch 19 at 22. In The Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation[2014] 1 SLR 1389, the Court of Appeal thought that the question of expropriati......
-
Can International Antitrust Be Saved for the Post-Boeing Merger World? A Proposal to Minimize International Conflict and to Rescue Antitrust from Misuse
...United States v. Imperial Chemical Indus., Ltd., 105 F.Supp. 215 (S.D.N.Y. 1952).12BritishNylonSpinners,Ltd.v.ImperialChern.Indus.,Ltd.,[1953] Ch. 19 (UK Ct. App.), [1955] 1 Ch. 37 (Chancery Ct.).13 Blocking statutes are designed to impede discovery procedures,andclaw-backstatutes aredesign......