British Telecommunications Plc v Williams
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
MacDonald v Ministry of Defence
...to a complaint of sexual harassment that a person of the opposite sex would have been similarly treated: see Morison J in British Telecommunications Plc v Williams [1997] IRLR 668, 17 In agreement with Ward LJ in Smith v Gardner Merchant Ltd [1999] ICR 134, 147-148, I respectfully think so......
-
Smith v Gardner Merchant Ltd
...[1986] I.C.R. 564, 569H. In a passage to which I must later refer again, Morison J. said in British Telecommunications PLC v Williams [1997] IRLR 668, 669.8:— "Discrimination on the grounds of sex can take many forms. Sexual harassment is a particular form. Sexual harassment can best be def......
-
Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School
...Porcelli v Strathclyde Regional Council [1986] IRLR 134, as applied by Morison J in the EAT in British Telecommunications PLC v Williams [1997] IRLR 668: "I agree with Morison J that in general in cases of sexual harassment there is no necessity to look for a comparison with a particular pe......
-
Macdonald v. Scotland (Advocate General), [2003] N.R. Uned. 173 (HL)
...198, 204, para. 11. Mr. Emmerson referred to the way the argument was put by Morison, J., in British Telecommunications Plc. v. Williams [1997] IRLR 668, 669, where he said: "To affect a person's dignity on the grounds of sex will, as with other forms of sexual harassment, cause a detr......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Liability of Employers for the Harassment of Employees by Non-Employees
...favourably and that she suffered a detriment as a result. In Br itish Telecommunications PLC v Williams47 the Employment Ap peals Tribunal (EAT) dened sexual harassment as “unwanted conduct of a sexual nat ure or other conduct based on sex affecting the dign ity of women and men at work.”4......