Brokelmann v Barr
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Year | 1971 |
| Date | 1971 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
R v Johnson Lucien
...meaning of the subsection. 20 With all respect to Mr Fortune, we think that that is a submission which is unsound in law. 21 In Brokelmann v Barr [1971] 2 QB 602, the defendant, who was a German national, landed in this country by boat with a car which he did not declare. It is not clear fr......
-
R v Lucien
...part of the appellant's baggage nor "carried with him" within the meaning of the subsection. His Lordship said that in Brokelman v BarrELR ((1971) 2 QB 602) an identical phrase in section 6 of the Finance Act 1968 had been held to mean "carried by sea or air". By analogy, section 78(2) of t......
-
Swindells v Cheshire County Council
...had been considered in connection with other statutes in Levene v IRCELR ([1928] AC 217), Fox v StirkELR ([1970] 2 QB 463) andBrokelemann v BarrELR ([1971] 2 QB 602) which showed that some degree of continuity or permanence was required. However, in all those cases a degree of continuity ha......
