Brooks v J. & P. Coates (U.K.) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1984 |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Cain v Francis; McKay v Hamlani
...v Brown. Consequently, if the delay (however long) does not seriously affect the evidence, the power will generally be exercised: eg Brooks v J&P Coates Ltd [1984] 1 All E.R. 702 and Hutcheson v Pontinental (Holiday Services)Ltd [1987] B.T.L.C.81.” Parker LJ approved of that passage save th......
-
Jeffrey Jones and Others v The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (First Defendant) Coal Products Ltd (Second Defendant)
...conditions of working. Mr Cox did not pursue the argument or his application to amend – rightly in my opinion." 5.38 However, in Brooks v J & P Coates165, the leading byssinosis case, when the point was fully argued, Boreham J took a different view. He said at 174E-175B: "…. The question re......
- Crocker v British Coal Corporation
-
Berger v Eli Lilly & Company
...Consequently if the delay (however long) does not seriously affect the evidence, the power will generally be exercised: e.g. Brooks v. J. & P. Coats Ltd [1984] 1 All E.R. 702 and Hutcheson v. Pontinental (Holiday Service) Ltd. [1987] B.T.L.C. 81)'. This passage in my judgment correctly sta......
Request a trial to view additional results