Brougham v Dwyer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1913
Date1913
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Bell Houses Ltd v City Wall Properties Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 1 April 1966
    ... ... 54 In ( Cotman v. Brougham 1918 Appeal Cases 514 ) a company called the Essequibo Rubber & Tobacco Estates Limited agreed to sub-underwrite 20,000 shares in another company ... ...
  • Re P.M.P.A. Garages Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1992
    ...of Brett L.J. quoted above and having dealt with other matters, in particular the decision of a Divisional Court in Brougham v. Dwyer 108 L.T. 504 he went on to say (at page 223):- "In my judgment, In re Coltman properly regarded, is a case, like Brougham v. Dwyer where the lender of money,......
  • Re P.M.P.A. Garages Ltd (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1992
    ...653. Bell Houses Ltd. v. City Wall Properties Ltd. [1966] 2 Q.B. 656; [1966] 2 W.L.R. 1323; [1966] 2 All E.R. 674. Brougham v. Dwyer (1913) 108 L.T. 504. Breckinridge Speedway Ltd. v. The Queen (in the right of Alberta)(1967) 64 D.L.R. 2d 488. Baroness Wenlock v. River Dee Company (1885) 10......
  • Communities Economic Development Fund v. Canadian Pickles Corp. et al., (1989) 62 Man.R.(2d) 170 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 9 November 1989
    ...of Alberta v. Meadow Rue Holdings Ltd. et al. (1986), 45 Alta. L.R.(2d) 294 (C.A.), not appld. [paras. 9, 27, 91]. Brougham v. Dwyer (1913), 108 L.T. 504, consd. [para. 29]. T.D. Bank v. Rooke (1983), 49 B.C.L.R. 168; 24 B.L.R. 124; 3 D.L.R.(4th) 715 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 71]. Donoghue v.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF RESTITUTION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...Mill Ltd. v. Martin[1985] 1 W.L.R. 1ll, 117—118.’ To these examples should be added a hypothetical variation of Brougham v. Dwyer(1913) 108 L.T. 504: an invalid lender brings an action against the borrower, not for money lent but failure of consideration (non-repayment). No system could bar......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT