Brown and Another v Bennett and Others (No 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date16 November 2001
Date16 November 2001
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Mr Justice Neuberger

Brown and Another
and
Bennett and Others (No 2)

Costs - wasted costs order - power to make order against any lawyer in the proceedings

Power to make costs order against any lawyer

The court had power to make a wasted costs order against any lawyer in the proceedings and not only against the legal representative of the party making the wasted costs application.

The liability of a barrister for a wasted costs order was not limited to his conduct of the proceedings in court, but extended to his involvement in acting or advising on the proceedings in any connection, including his involvement in drafting or settling any document in the proceedings.

An application for a wasted costs order was to be determined by reference to the question of whether, but for the conduct complained of, the costs in question would, on the balance of probabilities, have been incurred.

Mr Justice Neuberger so held in the Chancery Division when dismissing a wasted costs application made against Mr David Oliver, QC, Mr Nicholas Asprey, Mr Timothy Evans and Abrahamson & Associates, counsel and solicitors of Graham and Edwina Brown, claimants in an action for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence.

The wasted costs applications was made by the defendants to that action, Maurice and Michael Bennett, Vivian John Walter Scott, Peter Anthony Richard Evans, David Peter Sarson, Stephen Kane (the Oasis defendants), Apa Partners and Co Ventures Ltd, Apa Ventures III, Apa Ventures III International Partners LP (the Apa defendants).

Section 51 of the Supreme Court 1981, as substituted by section 4(1) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, provides:

"(6) In any proceedings … the court may disallow, or (as the case may be) order the legal or other representatives concerned to meet, the whole of any wasted costs or such part of them as may be determined in accordance with rules of court.

"(7) In subsection (6), 'wasted costs' means any costs incurred by a party - (a) as a result of any improper, unreasonable or negligent act or omission on the part of any legal or other representative or any employee of such a representative…

"(13) In this section 'legal or other representative', in relation to a party to proceedings, means any person exercising a right of audience or right to conduct litigation on his behalf."

Ms Barbara Dohmann, QC and Mr Robert Anderson for the Oasis defendants; Mr Richard Slowe, solicitor and Mr Paul Stanley for the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • R (A and Others) v Lord Saville of Newdigate; R (on the application of Widgery Soldiers) v Members of The Tribunal Sitting as The Bloody Sunday Inquiry
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 Diciembre 2001
    ...The Court of Appeal so held in a reserved judgment when dismissing an appeal against the order of the Queen's Bench Division (The Times November 21, 2001) granting an application by A and 35 other soldiers and former soldiers for judicial review of the decision on August 1, 2001 of the Bloo......
  • Byrne v Sefton Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 Noviembre 2001
    ...section 51(6). 31We have been referred to a decision of Neuberger J in Brown & Another v Bennett & Others (No.2) reported in the Times on 21 November 2001 and delivered a few days earlier on 16 November. The question in that case was whether solicitors and counsel who had acted for the clai......
5 books & journal articles
  • Big Data and Pharmacovigilance: Using Health Information Exchanges to Revolutionize Drug Safety
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 99-1, November 2013
    • 1 Noviembre 2013
    ...proposal does not seek to replace existing 371. Melody Petersen, Increased Spending on Drugs Is Linked to More Advertising , N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 21, 2001), http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/21/business/increased-spending-on-drugs-is-linked-to-more-advertising.html. 372. Rotthoff, supra note 107, ......
  • Judicial restraints on illegal state violence: Israel and the United States.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 35 No. 1, January 2002
    • 1 Enero 2002
    ...however, claim that torture still occurs. See Elizabeth Olson, Israel Denies Groups' Charge that It Is Torturing Detainees, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 21, 2001, at A10. See also Israel's Shin Bet Still Tortures Despite Court Ban, Report Says, DEUTSCHE PRESSE-AGENTUR, Sept. 6, 2000 (describing report ......
  • Edison schools and the privatization of K-12 public education: a legal and policy analysis.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 30 No. 4, May 2003
    • 1 Mayo 2003
    ...Phila. Schools, PHILA. INQUIRER, Nov. 21, 2001, at A1; Jacques Steinberg, Pennsylvania Abandons Plan To Privatize School Offices, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 21, 2001, at (29.) Pennsylvania Department of Education, Declaration of Distressed School District Status (Dec. 21, 2001) (on file with author);......
  • America's new war on terror: the case for self-defense under international law.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Vol. 25 No. 2, March 2002
    • 22 Marzo 2002
    ...killed at Pearl Harbor. See Eric Lipton, A Nation Challenged: The Toll; Toll From Attack at Trade Center is Down Sharply, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 21, 2001, at Al. According to Attorney General John Ashcroft, citizens of 86 nations were killed in the September 11 terrorist attacks. Linda Wertheimer......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT