Brown v Brown
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Sammel and Others v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd
...attend the meeting or whether he can safely let the resolutions be passed without further enquiry. See Pennington, Company Law, 2nd ed., (1968) p. 518; Cilliers and Benade, Company Law, (1968) p. 172. As Professor Gower points out (Modern Company Law, 2nd ed. at p. 440) there have been many......
-
Kd (Otherwise C) v Mc
...64. Kish v. Invaskoics (1973) 2 W.W.R. 678. Law v. Gustin [1976] Fam. 155; [1975] 1 W.L.R. 863; [1976] 1 All E.R. 123. Brown v. Brown [1968] P. 518; [1968] 2 All E.R. 11; [1968] 2 W.L.R. 969. Peters v. Peters [1968] P. 275; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1235; [1967] 2 All E.R. 318. Mather v. Mahoney [196......
-
Downer v Downer
...of the matrimonial home. Residence in a jurisdiction for 3 years has been held to satisfy the test of a real and substantial connection – Brown v. Brown [1968] 2 All E.R. 11. Examining the reality of the parties’ connection to Barbados and New Jersey, it is clear to me that, even though the......