Brown v Liverpool Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1969 |
| Year | 1969 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
McAuley v Bristol City Council
...to numerous authorities including Barrett v. Lunova Limited [1989] 1 All E.R. 251; Sleafer v. Lambeth B.C. [1960] 1 Q.B. 43; Brown v. Liverpool Corporation [1969] 3 All E.R. 1345; Duke of Westminster v. Guild [1985] Q.B. 668; Hopwood v. Cannock Chase D.C. [1975] 1 W.L.R. 373 and to Liverp......
-
Liverpool City Council v Irwin
... ... The houses were said to he unfit for human habitation. So the Corporation demolished them and built three tower blocks instead. That was in 1966. But within 18 months the conditions there became so bad that, by all ... ...
-
Edwards v Kumarasamy
...subsection 11, is hard to reconcile with the reasoning in Campden Hill. 20 Instead, the Court of Appeal in this case relied on Brown v Liverpool Corpn [1969] 3 All ER 1345, where the premises consisted of a terraced house to which access was obtained from the street through a gate, down so......
- Hopwood v Rugeley Urban District Council
1 books & journal articles
-
Improving Housing Conditions in the Private and Social Rented Sectors: The Homes (Fit for Human Habitation) Act 2018 ‐ Fit for Habitation but Fit for Purpose?
...to the premises represent a substantial change to the life and value73 It has been held in Brown vLiverpool Corp [1969] 3 All ER 1345 that access paths and steps werepart of a dwelling’s exterior for the purposes of LTA 1985, s 11.74 Edwards vKumarasamy [2016] UKSC 40; on which see, amongst......