Brueton v Woodward
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1941 |
| Date | 1941 |
| Year | 1941 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Centro Internationale Handelsbank AG v Morgan Grenfell Trade Finance Ltd [QBD (Comm)]
...in the judgment: Baker v Courage & CoELR [1910] 1 KB 56. Brickfield Properties Ltd v NewtonWLR [1971] 1 WLR 862. Brueton v WoodwardELR [1941] 1 KB 680. Jose Cardoso de Pina v MS “Birka” Beutler Schiffahrts KGUNK [1994] ILPr 694. Kalfelis v Bankhaus Schroder, Munchmeyer, Hengst & CoECAS (Cas......
-
Biraja Pada Bhattacharya v Oaksix Holdings Ltd
...section 9 of the Limitation Act and sections 26 and 28 of FSMA and the nature of the underlying claim. 26 First, Mr Shepherd relied on Brueton v Woodward [1941] 1 K.B. 680. The plaintiff in that case was a bookmaker who had paid cheques in June 1922 to the defendant in respect of bets plac......
-
Bhattacharya and Another v Omni Capital Partners Ltd
...are founded in contract or tort, there is no period of limitation and so the doctrine of laches applies. 38 Mr Berkley relies upon Brueton v Woodward [1941] 1 KB 680, a claim to recover gaming debts under the Gambling Acts 1835 and 1922. Mr Chirnside distinguishes the position there, as ap......
- Patel and Others v Peel Investments (South) Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results