Bryant v Lefever

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1878
Year1878
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Hunter et al. v. Canary Wharf Ltd.; Hunter et al. v. London Docklands Development Corp., (1997) 215 N.R. 1 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 24 Abril 1997
    ...v. Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police, [1992] 2 All E.R. 65; 131 N.R. 194 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 78]. Bryant v. Lefever (1879), 4 C.P.D. 172, refd to. [para. 85]. Bury v. Pope (1588), Cro. Eliz. 118, refd to. [para. 85]. Webb v. Bird (1861), 10 C.B.N.S. 268, refd to. [para. 86].......
  • Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 Abril 1997
    ...prescription: Aldred's Case (1610) 9 Co.Rep 57b. The same is true of a right to the uninterrupted flow of undefined air to a chimney: Bryant v. Lefever (1879) 4 C.P.D. 172. In the absence of an easement, there is no right to light. In Bury v. Pope (1587) Cro.Eliz. 118 the owner of land was ......
  • Webb v Bird and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 1 Enero 1863
    ...IN THE EXCHEQUER CHAMBER Webb and Bird and Others S. C. 31 L. J. C. P. 335; 8 Jur. N. S. 521. Followed, Bryant v. Lefever, 1879, L. R. 4 C. P. D. 172. Distinguished, Sturyes v. Bridgman, 1879, 11 Ch. D. 855. See Dalton v. Angus, 1881, 6 App. Cas. 750. Referred to, Hollins v. Verney, 1884, 1......
2 books & journal articles
  • Coase's Parable
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 74-3, March 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...Cost, supra note 7, at 8.101. 11 Ch.D. 852 (1879); see also infra Part IV.A.102. 5 Eq. 166 (1867-1868); see also infra Part IV.B.103. 4 C.P.D. 172 (1878-1879); see also infra Part IV.C.104. 25 Q.B.D. 481 (1890); see also infra Part IV.D. In addition to these four cases (Sturges v. Bridgman,......
  • What did Ronald Coase know about the law of tort?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 39 No. 3, April 2016
    • 1 Abril 2016
    ...upon, followed or distinguished in three of Coase's four cases: Sturges v Bridgman (1879) 11 Ch D 852; Bryant v Lefever (1878-9) LR 4 CPD 172; Bass v Gregory (1890) 25 QBD 481. Ibis unsatisfactory thread of argument, if this is the right description, does demonstrate shortcomings which dire......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT