Burgh v Wentworth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1576
Date01 January 1576
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 29

IN CHANCERY

Burgh
and
Wentworth

Mews' Dig. tit Executor and Administrator, XIII. Proceedings by or against, b. 2. Account; tit. Infant, H. Guardian, 4. Duties and Powers, c. Accounts; tit. Trust and Trustee, C. The Trustee, 11. Liabilities of Trustees for Breaches of Trusts, iii. Deceased Trustees.

burgh v. wentworth. The defendants, executors to their father, being guardian in socage to the plaintant, are ordered to answer for profits taken by him.-The bill is against the defendants as executors to their father, who in his lifetime being guardian in socage to the plaintant, in right of the plaintant's mother, whom he married, for and concerning profits by him taken of the lands of the plaintant during his minority, for fines of leases, wood-sales, and wilful decay of houses, and doth aver assets sufficient to be come to their hands; the defendants demur, because not privy, nor chargeable by law, but ordered to answer: Burgh, .plaintant; Wentworth, defendant (Anno 18 & 19 Eliz...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles
  • Pay vs. performance.
    • United States
    • Business North Carolina Vol. 23 No. 9, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...Ruddick Charlotte 51 James C. McGill (Q-FSBC) $175.0 43 1st State Bancorp Burlington 52 Stephen H. Clark (O-SPCS) 375.0 -- SpectraSite (7) Cary 53 Darryl W. Thompson (Q-TGIC) 244.0 26 Triad Guaranty Winston-Salem 54 Robert F. Lowe (Q-LXBK) 277.0 56 LSB Bancshares Lexington 55 Robert W. Wins......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT