Burrell & Son v Russell & Company

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date24 October 1900
Date24 October 1900
Docket NumberNo. 5.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
1st Division

Lord President, Lord Adam, Lord M'Laren, Lord Kinnear.

No. 5.
Burrell & Son
and
Russell & Co.

Expenses—Fees to counsel—Proof—Hearing in Inner-House.—

In a case in which the proof lasted twelve days, and the hearing in the Inner-House nine days, the successful party objected to a reduction by the Auditor of the fees allowed for each day of the proof and hearing respectively to senior counsel from thirty and twenty guineas to twenty and fifteen guineas, and to junior counsel from twenty and fifteen guineas to fifteen and ten guineas. The Court repelled the objection, and approved of the Auditor's report.

Expenses—Fee to witness.—

In a case in which a certified skilled witness was paid £214, 10s. for work which, according to his account, occupied fifty-nine days, the Court approved of the Auditor's report fixing his fee at £67, 7s. 6d.

In this action, reported 2 F. (H. L.) 81, the House of Lords, on 26th March 1900, reversing the judgment of the First Division, found the pursuers entitled to £16,000 of damages. The pursuers were also found entitled to expenses.

The Auditor having taxed the pursuers' account of expenses at £2554, 8s. 3d., the pursuers lodged objections to his report in so far as he had disallowed (1) certain fees to counsel, and (2) a fee to a certified skilled witness.

The proof and hearing on evidence in the case lasted twelve days, and the hearing on a reclaiming note in the Inner-House lasted nine days.

The fees charged in the account for each day of the proof and hearing on evidence were for senior counsel thirty guineas, and for junior counsel twenty guineas; and for each day of the hearing in the Inner-House, senior counsel twenty guineas, and junior counsel fifteen guineas, and the Auditor had allowed twenty and fifteen guineas to senior counsel, and fifteen and ten guineas to junior counsel.

The witness whose fee was in question was Mr W. H. Campbell, naval architect, Glasgow, who had rendered and been paid an account of £214, 10s. ‘for professional services rendered to Messrs Burrell & Son in their action against Messrs Russell & Company.’ According to the account the time for which Mr Campbell was actually engaged was fifty-nine days, and the work consisted of making calculations, supervising the making of and making models, plans, and sections, displacement scales, preparing precognition, consultations, and attendance (two days) at the proof. The Auditor allowed £67, 7s. 6d.

Argued for the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • R v Dean Thomas
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 January 2020
    ...and 33BB into the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 has not been commenced). The Practice Direction contains the following: i. “ 3F.12 The court may direct the appointment of an intermediary to assist a defendant in reliance on its inherent powers ( C v Sevenoaks Youth Court [20......
  • R v Billy Nathan Midmore
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 April 2017
    ...in force (because s.104 Coroners and Justice Act 2009, which would insert ss. 33BA and 33BB into the YJCEA 1999, has yet to be commenced). 3F. 12 The court may direct the appointment of an intermediary to assist a defendant in reliance on its inherent powers ( C v Sevenoaks Youth Court [20......
  • Whittalls Wines Ltd & European Food Brokers Ltd v The Commissioners For Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, TC 06316
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 1 February 2018
    ...documents for such visits, financial health, credit checks, and trading history. NB. Jatinder Chatha knew about this letter at the time [§50: 3/F/12]. 6 Nov 14 Email [75/29]. Officer Maskew forwarded Excise Notice 196 to Philip Eagleton. 25 13 Nov 2014 Letter [75/31]. IoM C&E advised GBDL/ ......
  • Caledonian Railway Company v Greenock Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 25 February 1922
    ...France, & Co., 1907 S. C. 705; Smellie v. Caledonian Railway Co., 1916 S. C. 930. For the defenders:—Burrell & Son v. Russell & Co.SC, 3 F. 12; Shaw & Shaw v. J. & T. Boyd, 1907 S. C. 1 1907 S. C. 965. 2 1907 S. C. 646. 1 (1863) 2 Macph. 346. 2 (1851) 13 D. 843. 3 (1870) 8 Macph. 1011. 4 (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Contingency Fees in England After April 2013
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 18 October 2012
    ...= { // Properties version: '0' , handler: '//fbapps.jdsupra.com/statistics/pixel?partnerID=dc4a1c64-176f-4a9f-913d-afd8f74f746f&file_unique_id=3f12e16d-cdf5-4537-a221-23095723033c&profile_id=8159&type=5&' // Public , pageview: function (data) { if (data === undefined) { data = this._curpage......
  • Rehabilitated Drug Addict's Disability Claims Were Properly Dismissed
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 1 March 2011
    ...'0' , handler: '//fbapps.jdsupra.com/statistics/pixel?partnerID=dc4a1c64-176f-4a9f-913d-afd8f74f746f&file_unique_id=6948d2c2-a000-4b61-83a7-3f12a5fddaf9&profile_id=12753&type=5&' // Public , pageview: function (data) { if (data === undefined) { data = this._curpage(); } else if (typeof (dat......
2 books & journal articles
16 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT