Burrough, Widow, v Skinner

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1770
Date01 January 1770
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 98 E.R. 387

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH

Burrough
Widow
and
er. Skinner

buhrough, Widow, ver. skinner. 1770. An auctioneer who has not paid a deposit over to his principal, is liable for the same to the bidder. The defendant was an auctioneer; and, in that character, had sold to the plaintiff an interest in land, for which the plaintiff had paid him a deposit of £50 but, upon an objection to the title, and the want of disclosure of certain circumstances which ought to have been disclosed at the time of the bidding, the plaintiff (the purchaser) declined going on with the contract; and, in the opinion of the Court, she had sufficient reason for so doing. She therefore required the auctioneer to pay her back 388 HEX V. DUNN a BURR. 2640. his deposit of £50. The auctioneer refused. Whereupon, the bidder brought this action against him, to recover it. The auctioneer paid £8 into Court. The cause was tried, and the plaintiff obtained a verdict. The auctioneer moved for a new trial; and had a rule to shew cause. But, upon shewing cause, The Court were clear, that the action lay against the auctioneer. The money does not appear to have been paid over by him to his principal. But if it had been so, yet the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Various North Point Pall Mall Purchasers v 174 Law Solicitors Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 Enero 2022
    ...[2015] UKSC 36, [2015] AC 1619 Bristol Alliance Nominee No 1 Ltd v Bennett [2013] EWCA Civ 1626, [2014] 1 EGLR 9 Burrough v Skinner (1770) 5 Burr 2639 C F Partners (UK) LLP v Barclays Bank Plc [2014] EWHC 3049 (Ch) Delta Petroleum (Caribbean) Ltd v British Virgin Islands Electricity Corp......
  • Bennett v Francis
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 Noviembre 1801
    ...received, viz. 11. 12s., and would have specifically applied the payment to the count for money had and received. In Bwrough v. Skivmer, 5 Burr. 2639, which was an action brought by a purchaser to recover back the deposit from an auctioneer in consequence of an objection to the title, the q......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT