Burrow v Scammell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1881
Year1881
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • O'Neill v Ryan (No. 3)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1992
    ...business in a highly volatile industry, relief by way of specific performance would be granted to the plaintiff. Burrow v. ScammellELR (1881) 19 Ch. D. 175 and Tamplin v. JamesELR (1880) 15 Ch. D. 215 considered. On appeal by the defendants from the judgment and order of the High Court it w......
  • Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 19 November 2004
    ...1 S.C.R. 980; referred to: Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 919, 2000 SCC 64; Burrow v. Scammell (1881), 19 Ch. D. 175; Air Canada v. British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1161; Canadian Pacific Air Lines Ltd. v. British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1133; Refer......
  • Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), (2004) 327 N.R. 100 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 June 2004
    ...[para. 14]. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980; 150 N.R. 1; 23 B.C.A.C. 81; 39 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 14]. Burrow v. Scammell (1881), 19 Ch. D. 175, refd to. [para. Air Canada and Pacific Western Airlines Ltd. v. British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1161; 95 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 39]. ......
  • Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), (2004) 206 B.C.A.C. 99 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 June 2004
    ...[para. 14]. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980; 150 N.R. 1; 23 B.C.A.C. 81; 39 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 14]. Burrow v. Scammell (1881), 19 Ch. D. 175, refd to. [para. Air Canada and Pacific Western Airlines Ltd. v. British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1161; 95 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 39]. ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Specific Performance and Injunctions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Remedies
    • 4 August 2020
    ..., Courts of Justice Act , above note 135, s 96. 138 See, for example, Kennedy v Spence (1911), 24 OLR 535 (HCJ); Burrow v Scammell (1881), 19 Ch D 175; Hurley v Roy (1921), 64 DLR 375 (Ont SCAD). 139 See, for example , Butler v Purcell (1956), 2 DLR (2d) 317 (NSSC) ; Lavine v Independent Bu......
  • Specific Performance and Injunctions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Contracts Part Six
    • 1 September 2005
    ...inducing the agreement. The 126 See, for example, Kennedy v. Spence (1911), 24 O.L.R. 535 (H.C.J.); Burrow v. Scammell (1881), 19 Ch. D. 175; Hurley v. Roy (1921), 64 D.L.R. 375 (Ont. S.C.A.D.). 127 See, for example , Butler v. Purcell (1956), 2 D.L.R. (2d) 317 (N.S.S.C.) ; Lavine v. Indepe......