Burton & Company v English & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 19 March 1883 |
| Date | 19 March 1883 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Tor Line A.B. v Alltrans Group of Canada Ltd (TFL Prosperity)
... ... But only one of the English cases in which the scope of this clause has been considered has reached ... and of Bowen L.J. almost exactly one hundred years ago in Burton v. English (1883) 12 Q.B.D. 218 at pages 220 and 222. One quotation from ... A/S v. Colonial Sugar Refining Company Ltd. [1960] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 206 was decided by Walsh J. in the Supreme ... ...
-
Union of India v E B Aaby's Rederi A/S (Evje)
... ... That was clearly the view of Lord Esher, Master of the Rolls, in Burton v. English (1883) 12 Q.3.D 218, at page 220 : It does not arise from any ... owner usually procures some one, such as a bank or an insurance company, to give an average bond ... 21 As with a bond, so ... ...
-
Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v Green
...in proportion to their interests. See the exposition by Lord Tenterden quoted in Hallett v. Wigram (1850 9 C.B.) at pages 607-608; and Burton v. English (1883 12 Q.B.D. 218). Likewise if the Master, for the sake of all, at the height of a storm, cuts away part of the ship's tackle (as in Bi......
-
Tempus Shipping Company Ltd v Louis Dreyfus & Company Ltd
...from his having agreed or assumed to carry them. Schmidt v. Royal Mail. 45 L.J.Q.B. 646 (1875), Crooks v. Allan, 5 Q.B.D. 38 (1879), Burton v. English, 10 Q.B.D. 426 (1883). Indeed, if it were otherwise, the exception of "perils of the sea" alone, the oldest of exceptions, would have made......
Request a trial to view additional results