Butterworth v Soutter
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Appleyard v Wewelwala [Ch D]
...of Floyd J's order, and that the court has inherent jurisdiction to do so. I regard this as plain from the combined effect of Butterworth v Soutter [2000] BPIR 582 and Thornhill v Atherton [2004] EWCA Civ 1858, in particular per Lloyd J (sitting as an additional judge of the Court of Appeal......
-
Whig v Whig
...(as here) the debtor himself – who should pay the trustees' costs of the bankruptcy if there is an annulment: Butterworth v Soutter [2000] BPIR 582 at page 585. 86 In the event of the annulment application being successful, the trustee in bankruptcy sought an order that the husband to pay h......
-
Sheida Oraki and Another v Dean & Dean (A Firm)and Another
...whether the trustee should have his expenses paid and who is to pay them. There are many dicta to this effect in the cases. Thus in Butterworth v Soutter [2000] BPIR 582 at 585, an annulment case, Neuberger J (as he then was) said: "The parties' arguments have all proceeded on the basis tha......
-
Anjam Amin v London Borough of Redbridge
...of the 1986 rules (and is now r 10.149 of the 2016 rules), but on annulment provision has to be made for them. In Butterworth v Soutter [2000] BPIR 582 (“ Butterworth”) at 586 Neuberger J had accepted the submission that on an annulment he had unfettered discretion to determine who, if anyb......
Request a trial to view additional results