Byers (Everette) v R
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Travis Duporte v DPP
...if the Judge draws the attention of the jury to material discrepancies and weaknesses going to the root of the prosecution case. Byers (Everette) v R (1996) 49 WIR 83, P.C. followed. 4. In a case where a man's life is at stake, the Court must conform to the strictures of the law, the sen......
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...was not prejudiced by the fact that the judge did not specifically address minor details in the evidence. R v Lawrence [1982] AC 510 and Byers v R (1996) 49 WIR 83 applied. (6) It was permissible for the prosecution to adduce evidence of possible lies told by Mr. Maduro in relation to a ......
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...by the fact that the judge did not specifically address minor details in the evidence. R v Lawrence [1982] AC 510 and Byers v R (1996) 49 WIR 83 applied. (6) It was permissible for the prosecution to adduce evidence of possible lies told by Mr. Maduro in relation to a telephone call to his......
-
Maduro v The Queen
...by the fact that the judge did not specifically address minor details in the evidence. R v Lawrence [1982] A.C. 510 and Byers v. R (1996) 49 W.I.R. 83 applied. (6) It was permissible for the prosecution to adduce evidence of possible lies told by Mr. Maduro in relation to a telephone call t......
Request a trial to view additional results