C v C (Maintenance Pending Suit: Legal Costs)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2006 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
B v B
...Fees), [2001] 1 W.L.R. 605; [2001] 1 FLR 377; [2001] 1 F.C.R. 226, considered. (2) C v. C (Maintenance Pending Suit: Legal Costs), [2006] 2 FLR 1207, considered. (3) CF v. KM (Financial Provision for Child: Costs of Legal Proceedings), [2011] 1 FLR 208; [2010] EWHC 1754 (Fam), referred to. ......
-
B Petitioner v B Respondent
...above, with modifications to take into account local practice, is commendable. 46 InC v. C (Maintenance Pending Suit: Legal Costs) [2006] 2 FLR 1207, Headley J considered an application by the wife to vary an order for maintenance pending suit which had been made by consent only three month......
-
K v C
...a negative response. 6. The exceptional test developed in TL v ML was looked at again in C v C (Maintenance Pending Suit : Legal Costs) (2006) 2 FLR 1207, where the wife applied to vary an order for maintenance pending suit made by consent to increase the amount to include a further signifi......
-
T v T
...need show exceptional circumstances. Ms Marshall, who appeared for W, referred me to C v. C (Maintenance Pending Suit: Legal Costs) [2006] 2 F.L.R. 1207, Fam D, in which the now discredited “exceptional circumstances” test was applied. Hedley, J. found at para 14 that the exceptional circum......
Request a trial to view additional results