C v C (Privilege) [Fd]
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2008 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
LS v PS
...the actual decisions in Eustice in relation to section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and in C v C (Privilege) [2006] EWHC 336 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 115, in relation to section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, should be questioned, whatever criticisms there may be of some of the reason......
-
KSO v MJO and JMO (PSO Intervening)
...Inspection duly took place on 10 January 2008. The documents disclosed included a number which, on the face of it, were privileged: see C v C (Privilege) [2006] EWHC 336 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 115. 14 On 30 January 2008 the mother-in-law applied to be joined as an intervener. At about the sam......
-
Anthony David Kerman v Tatiana Akhmedova
...to be shown to a solicitor for advice …” I respectfully agree with that. 52 I add that in C v C (Privilege) [2006] EWHC 336 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 115, para 33, I said: “… the Anstalt is, on the face of it, entitled to claim privilege in the relevant parts of the conveyancing file – that is, ......
-
LS v PS
...the actual decisions in Eustice in relation to section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and in C v C (Privilege) [2006] EWHC 336 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 115, in relation to section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, should be questioned, whatever criticisms there may be of some of the reason......
Request a trial to view additional results