C v Special Educational Needs Tribunal
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
CM HS 169 2011
...but it was not. 49. In S v Somerset County Council [2002] EWHC 1808 Admin; [2003] ELR 78, Sir Richard Tucker followed C v SENT [1997] ELR 390. He did so based in part on the view espoused in that case that if Parliament had intended local [education] authorities to take into account the cos......
-
London Borough of Croydon v K-A (SEN)
...from the narrower conclusion reached by Sir Richard Tucker in Somerset and the similar conclusion reached by Dyson J in C v SEN Tribunal (1997) ELR 390. 23. HH Judge Pearl went on to “agree absolutely” with what was said by Mr Andrew Nicol QC about W v Leeds City Council and SEND Tribunal [......
-
O v London Borough of Lewisham and Another
...school. Does s.9 of the Education Act 1996 apply where the choice is between two maintained schools 11 In C v Buckinghamshire County Council and Special Educational Needs Tribunal [1999] ELR 179 the parents could not invoke paragraph 3(3) because their preferred school was in the independen......
-
Wendy Haining v Warrington Borough Council
...There are conflicting decisions on this issue, but it is common ground that none of them is binding on this court. 12 In C v Special Educational Needs Tribunal [1997] ELR 390 at p 401, I said that "public expenditure" must be a reference to expenditure by Local Education Authorities (LEAs),......
Request a trial to view additional results