Callachand and Another v State
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Yourrick Furlonge Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...of 20 years imprisonment. It must be borne in mind that the appellant spent 2 years on remand. Applying the principles enunciated in Callachand & Anor, the sentence of 20 years is to take effect from the date upon which he was in custody. Conclusion 73 I would dismiss the appeal against con......
-
Gomes v Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
...those remanded into custody, a consequence of his flight risk. 20 Mr Aidan Casey for the State submitted that the judge correctly applied Callachand ( supra) and was entitled to conclude that the appellant's breach of bail and flight from the jurisdiction had resulted in him spending longer......
-
Aidan Richard Sherry v The Queen
...without a statutory provision to that effect, as this is now the general principle applied in other comparable jurisdictions: see Callanchand v The State [2008] UKPC 49, [2009] 4 LRC 777 (the Privy Council on appeal from Mauritius); Romeo de Costa Hall v The Queen [2011] CCJ 6 (AJ) (the C......
-
The Queen Claimant v Andrew Kagan Richardson Defendant [ECSC]
...provide adequate time for treatment to take root and for the defendant to complete the process of rehabilitation. ( See: Cases ofCallachand et al. v. The State (2008) UKPC 49; and Romeo Costa Hill v. The Queen—CCJ Appeal No. 1 of 2010). 73 . By virtue of the foregoing reasons taking all the......
Request a trial to view additional results