Callis v Gunn

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Date1963
Year1963

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
62 cases
  • Cheng Swee Tiang v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1964
  • Re Operation Tempura
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 4 April 2008
    ...Ltd., [1981] A.C. 1096; [1980] 3 W.L.R. 774; [1981] 1 All E.R. 417; (1981), 124 Sol. Jo. 812, considered. (4) Callis v. Gunn, [1964] 1 Q.B. 495; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 931; [1963] 3 All E.R. 677; (1963), 48 Cr. App. R. 36; 107 Sol. Jo. 831, followed. (5) Canadian Pacific Wine Co. Ltd. v. Tuley, [1......
  • R v Rowe
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 27 July 2004
    ...and TIBBETTS Ms. C. Richards, Senior Crown Counsel and A. Mon-Desir, Crown Counsel, for the Crown; Cases cited: (1) Callis v. Gunn, [1964] 1 Q.B. 495; [1963] 3 All E.R. 677, applied. (2) Chan Wei Keung v. R., [1967] 2 A.C. 160; [1967] 1 All E.R. 948, referred to. (3) Customs & Excise Commrs......
  • Maycock et Al v Commissioner of Police
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 28 April 1995
    ...it could be: Kuruma v. The Queen [1955] A.C. 197, 204, Lord Parker, C.J., and Lord Widgery, C.J. thought so too: see Callis v. Gunn [1964] 1 Q.B. 495, 502 and Jeffrey v. Black [1978] Q.B. 490. The dicta of three successive Lord Chief Justices are not to be lightly rejected. It is unnecessar......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Evidence 1
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 10. Part I Evidence 1
    • 30 June 2016
    ...by the Privy Council. See further: Joshua Adekanbi v. Attorney General, Western State of Nigeria (1966) 1 All N.L.R. 47; Callis v. Gunn (1964) 1 Q.B. 495, 501 and Section 5 of the Evidence Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990 which states: - “Nothing in this act shall prejudice the a......
  • THE CONCEPT OF VOLUNTARINESS IN THE LAW OF CONFESSIONS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...of questioning suspects. See David Wolchover & Anthony Heaton-Armstrong, Confession Evidence (Sweet & Maxwell, 1996) at p 117. 18 [1964] 1 QB 495. 19 Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance 1960. 20 The prohibition against using police statements as evidence had already been slowly er......
  • Preliminary sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 10. Part I Preliminary sections
    • 30 June 2016
    ...375, 329 C.R.P.D. & Co. Ltd. v. Obongha (2000) 8 N.W.L.R. (Pt.670) 751………………...........……263, 35 Callis v. Gunn (1964) 1 Q.B. 495, 501…………………………………………...........……………52 Calvenply v. Pekab Int. Ltd (2001) 16 W.R.N. 84; (2001) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 717) 164. …......…..426 Cardoso v. Daniel (1986) 2......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 37-6, June 1964
    • 1 June 1964
    ...evidence and the appeal was dismissed ([1964] IAll E.R. 502).The judgment also comments on the important ruling in Callis v.Gunn [1963] 3 All E.R. 677; XXXVII P.J. 73, which wasdiscussed inthe February issue of thePOLICEJOURNALthis year.The defendant, who had been charged with loitering, wa......
  • Get Started for Free