Caly v Joslin & Uxor'

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1681
Date01 January 1681
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 901

King's Bench Division

Caly
and
Joslin & Uxor'

caly versus joslin & uxor'. trin. 23 car. rot. 1282. Debt. In debt for rent upon a lease for years against the husband and wife, executrix, which was laid in the debet and detinet; upon plene administravit pleaded, and a demurrer thereupon, the case was well debated by reason of contrary resolutions; for 902 MICH. 23 CAR. BANCO REGIS ALEYH. SB. Hargrave's case was reversed in the Exchequer, Co. 5. 31. because the action was in the debet and detinet; but afterwards, 7 Jac. between the Lord Rich and Frank, in C. B. upon great debate it was adjudged good in the debet and detinet. And the like judgment was given 9 Jac. in C. B. in Sir Henry Carye's case. And after that, Pasc. 17 Jac. Rot. 346. B. R. between Paule and Moody it was adjudged good in the detinet only. And the like, 7 Car. in the Common Pleas, and the same year in this Court between Smith and Nichols; and the reasons of these contrary opinions was the incooveniency of the one side and the other ; for in as much as the executors cannot waive the term, it were hard if the rent should exceed the value of the land, and they having no assets, that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • City National Leasing Ltd. v. General Motors of Canada Ltd., (1989) 32 O.A.C. 332 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • 20 April 1989
    ...de subvention des taux d'intérêt préférentiels de 1970 à 1980 constituait une pratique de discrimination fondée sur les prix interdite par l'al. 34(1)a) de la Loi, ce qui permettait à CNL d'intenter une action en vertu de l'art. 31.1. CNL prétend que sa perte de profits équivaut à la somme ......
  • Nassereddine c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 24 January 2014
    ...:Encore là, je ne pense pas que la SI [Section d’immigration] a commis une erreur dans son interprétation de l’al. 34(1)f) de la Loi. Cette disposition fait en sorte qu’un étranger est interdit de territoire en raison de son appartenance à une organi......
  • Nulyarimma v Thompson; Buzzacott v Minister for the Environment
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 September 1999
    ...from that applicable in Australia. For example, see Shearer, ‘The Relationship between International Law and Domestic Law’ in Opeskin et al 34 at 38–40. (c) Australia [123] Although the High Court has on occasions accepted that customary international law forms part of the Australian law (s......
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Holder (Sir H. C.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 15 April 1932
    ...(4) The following cases were referred to in support:- Bradford Old Bank v. Sutcliffe, [1918] 2 K.B. 833. Eaton v.Bell, [1821] 5 B. & Al. 34. Crosskill v.Bower, 32 L.J. (Ch.) 540. Parr's Banking Co. v.Yates, [1898] 2 Q.B. 460. Provincial Bank of Irelandv. O'Reilly, 26 I.R. 313. Reddie v.Will......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
28 books & journal articles
  • National Class Actions in Canada: Yet Another Call for Clarity and Coordination
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-1, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...aux marchands détaillants ltée (Household Finance)31, A.P.A. c. Toyota 32, Brault & Martineau c. Riendeau 33, Marcotte c. Banque de Montréal34, auxquelles s’ajoutent de 28 Tremaine c. A. H. Robins Canada inc., [1990] R.D.J. 500 (C.A. QC); Power c. Bristol Myers Squibb Co. [règlement hors co......
  • Le Recours Collectif et La Loi Sur La Protection Du Consommateur : Complicité, Utilité, Complémentarité
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-1, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...aux marchands détaillants ltée (Household Finance)31, A.P.A. c. Toyota 32, Brault & Martineau c. Riendeau 33, Marcotte c. Banque de Montréal34, auxquelles s’ajoutent de 28 Tremaine c. A. H. Robins Canada inc., [1990] R.D.J. 500 (C.A. QC); Power c. Bristol Myers Squibb Co. [règlement hors co......
  • Necessary Analysis - Unexpected Outcomes
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-1, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...aux marchands détaillants ltée (Household Finance)31, A.P.A. c. Toyota 32, Brault & Martineau c. Riendeau 33, Marcotte c. Banque de Montréal34, auxquelles s’ajoutent de 28 Tremaine c. A. H. Robins Canada inc., [1990] R.D.J. 500 (C.A. QC); Power c. Bristol Myers Squibb Co. [règlement hors co......
  • Some Reflections on the 'responsible Issuer' Definition and Jurisdictional Aspects of Securities Class Actions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 8-1, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...aux marchands détaillants ltée (Household Finance)31, A.P.A. c. Toyota 32, Brault & Martineau c. Riendeau 33, Marcotte c. Banque de Montréal34, auxquelles s’ajoutent de 28 Tremaine c. A. H. Robins Canada inc., [1990] R.D.J. 500 (C.A. QC); Power c. Bristol Myers Squibb Co. [règlement hors co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT