Camden (Marquis) v Murray
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1880 |
| Year | 1880 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Foo Jee Seng v Foo Jhee Tuang
...Re Will of [1997] 3 SLR (R) 956; [1999] 3 SLR 370 (folld) Londonderry's Settlement, Re [1965] Ch 918 (folld) Marquis Camden v Murray (1880) 16 Ch D 161 (folld) Public Trustee v Cooper [2001] WTLR 901 (folld) Tempest v Lord Camoys (1882) 21 Ch D 571 (folld) Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006......
-
Sampson v Union and Rhodesia Wholesale Ltd (In Liquidation)
...Stride v Wepener (1903, T.H. 383 at p. 386); Cobbet v Brock (19 R.R. 523); Baimbridge v Browne (18 Ch. D. 188); Standard Bank v du Plooy (16 Ch.D. 161) and Clough v L.N.W.R. (L.R. 7 Ex. 26 at pp. 34, Stuart replied. Cur adv vult. Postea (July 4th). Judgment Wessels, J.A.: This was an action......
-
Foo Jee Seng and others v Foo Jhee Tuang and another
...non-intervention is one of some longevity, dating back to at least the 19th century where in the 1880 case of the Marquis Camden v Murray 16 Ch D 161, Jessel MR was reluctant to substitute the trustees’ discretion with that of the court’s, in the absence of mala fides. This principle was fu......
-
The Estate of The Earl of Desart
......In the case of Marquis Camden v. Murray(1), there were special reasons why the Court sanctioned the sale of the ......