Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Steamship Storstad and Others
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 05 December 1919 |
| Date | 05 December 1919 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Caspian Basin Specialised Emergency Salvage Administration and Another v Bouygues Offshore SA and Others ; Ultisol Transport Contractors Ltd v Bouygues Offshore SA and Others
...[1997] CLC 1,443. Caltex Singapore Pte Ltd v BP Shipping LtdUNK [1996] 1 Ll Rep 286. Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Steamship StorstadELR [1920] AC 397. De Dampierre v de DampierreELR [1988] AC 92. Falstria, TheUNK [1988] 1 Ll Rep 495. Fothergill v Monarch Airlines LtdELR [1981] AC 251. Gold......
-
Saipem S.p.A. v Dredging VO2 B.v (Volvox Hollandia)
...below, with the result that neither is referred to in his judgment. The first was the decision of the Privy Council in Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. S.S. "Storstad" (1920) AC 397. There had been a disastrous collision between the Storstad and the Empress of Ireland in which the latter......
-
Ultisol Transport Contractors Ltd v Bouygues Offshore SA ('The Bos 400')
... ... James v London and South Western Railway CoELR (1872) LR 7 Ex 187 ... A barge, the Bos 400, owned by a French company, Bouygues, was being towed from the Congo to Cape ... against the other parties; nor can those others be restrained from proceeding against Bouygues to ... ...
-
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Hay
...12 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 335 108 L. T. Rep. 722 18 Com. Cas. 163 Canadian Pacific Railway v. Owners of the StorstadDID=ASPM 14 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 530 122 L. T. Rep. 440 (1920) A. C. 397 The CrathieDID=ASPMELR 8 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 256 76 L. T. Rep. 534 (1897) P. 178 The Emilie MillonDID=ASPMELR......