Canniford v Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Judgment Date1991
Year1991
Date1991

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Re Freerider Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 11 November 2009
    ...E.R. 492, considered. (11) Hydrosan Ltd., In re, [1991] BCC 19; [1991] BCLC 418, dicta of Harman J. applied. (12) Milgate Devs., In re, [1991] BCC 24; [1993] BCLC 291, followed. (13) Pickering v. StephensonELR(1872), L.R. 14 Eq. 322; 41 L.J. Ch. 493; 26 L.T. 608, considered. (14) Strategic ......
  • Royal Westminster Investments Sa and Others v Manmohan Varma
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 November 2012
    ...the s 459 petition, but in substance the dispute is between the two shareholders". 24 Other unfair prejudice cases include Re Milgate Developments Ltd [1991] BCC 24, Re a company (No 004502 of 1988), ex p. Johnson [1992] BCLC 701, Re a Company No. 001126 of 1992 [1994] 2 BCLC 146, Arrow Tra......
  • Gerard Dowling and Others v Alan Cook and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 August 2013
    ...1872 LR 14 EQ 322 CROSSMORE ELECTRICAL & CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD 1989 BCLC 137 1989 5 BCC 37 MILGATE DEVELOPMENTS LTD, IN RE 1993 BCLC 291 1991 BCC 24 INSOLVENCY ACT 1986 S127(UK) COMPANIES ACT 1963 S218 AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY v ETHICON LTD 1975 1 AER 504 COMPANY, A (004502 OF 1988) IN RE ......
  • Mr Michael Gott v Mr Rune Hauge
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 June 2020
    ...for legal proceedings. 48 The Respondents also relied on Re Crossmore Electrical and Civil Engineering Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 37, Re Milgate Developments Ltd [1991] BCC 24, ex parte Johnson [1992] BCLC 24 and Re A Company [1994] BCLC 146 for the proposition that, even in a dispute between shareho......
  • Get Started for Free