Carl v University of Sheffield
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | UKEAT/261/08 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Appeal By The Advocate General For Scotland And John Barton Against A Decision And Order Of The Eat Dated 24 April 2015
...because he was a part-time worker; whether the approach in McMenemy v Capita Business Services Ltd or in Carl v University of Sheffield [2009] ICR 1286 was applied, it could not be concluded, at this stage, that the requisite causal connection would be established. Secondly, if he was refus......
-
Mrs Cairns and others v Newport County Council and The Governing Body of High Cross School: 1601371/2020 and others
...sufficient that being part time was one of the reasons for the treatment. That approach was followed in Carl v University of Sheffield 2009 IRLR 616, EAT where the Employment Appeal Tribunal said that part time work must be the ‘effective and predominant cause’ of the less favourable treatm......
-
Ministry of Justice v Mr S Blackford
...Regulation 5(2)(a) of the 2000 Regulations. The approach of the Tribunal was to follow the approach in Carl v University of Sheffield [2009] IRLR 616 so that the interpretation is consistent with the same phrase in other domestic legislation. This required, in the present context, part-time......
-
Mrs J Carter v British Midland Regional Ltd: 2600206/2017 and 2600765/2017
...than an actual and comparable full-time worker, a hypothetical worker comparison is not permissible. (Carl v University of Sheffield [2009] IRLR 616). If there is a difference in treatment, the claim will be made out only if that treatment is on the ground that the worker is a part-time wor......
Request a trial to view additional results