Carshore v North Eastern Railway Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1884 |
Date | 1884 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
PASIR BOGAK INDAH SDN. BHD. vs ONG CHIN WEI
...court will not, in granting leave, consider the merits of the claim (Edison & Co v Holland (1889) 33 ChD 497; Carshore v North East Rly (1885) 29 ChD 344 at 347) but will leave these matters and objections by the plaintiff to be dealt with upon the application for directions under r 4; see ......
-
So Kai Hau v Ysk2 Engineering Co Ltd And Others
...16 rule 4 of the RHC (see Hong Kong Civil Procedure 2010 Vol.1 para.16/2/5 at p.330). 36. In Carshore v North Eastern Railway Company (1885) 29 Ch D 344, Cotton LJ said as follows at “The right to serve notice on a third party is confined by Order XVI., rule 48, to a third party against who......
-
Annett Furs Ltd. v. British America Insurance Co. et al., (1976) 14 N.B.R.(2d) 621 (QB)
...Co. v. Duncan, 1 Q.B.D. 644 (C.A.), appld. [para. 7]. Bower v. Hartley, 1 Q.B.D. 652 (C.A.), appld. [para. 7]. Carshire v. N.E. Rlwy., 29 Ch. D. 344 (C.A.), appld. [para Barton v. L. & N.W. Rlwy., 38 Ch. D. 144 (C.A.), appld. [para. 7]. Statutes Noticed: Rules of Court (N.B.), Order 16a......
-
Westlands Industrial Park Ltd. v. Burgee Developments Ltd., (1982) 40 A.R. 451 (QBM)
...refuse to give directions, and that the effect of his decision will be to dismiss the third party from the action: Carshore v. N.E. Ry., 29 Ch.D. 344; 54 L.J. Ch. 760; Baxter v. France, [1895] 1 Q.B. 455; 64 L.J. Q.B. 335; Bolduc v. Larose, 5 Terr. L.R. 6. The object of third party rules is......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
INDEMNITY
...12 Q.B.D. 152, Cattan v. Benneth, 25 Ch.D 161, Speller v. Bristol Steam Navigation Co. 13 W.B.D. 96, Carshore v. North Eastern railway 29 Ch. D. 344, Birmingham Land Co. v. London & North Western Railway 34 Ch. D 272, Tritton v. Bankart 56 L.J. Ch. 629 per Davey L.J. Guild v. Conrad (18......