Carstairs v Taylor

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1865
Year1865
CourtExchequer
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Gilson v Kerrier District Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 Marzo 1976
    ...the outflow from the catchpit into the culvert under High Castle Rise. 22 We were referred to two authorities, ( Carstairs v. Taylor 6 Exchequer Cases, 217) and ( Prosser v. Levy 1955 1 Weekly Law Reports, 1224), as authority for the proposition that even if the Council was not immune from-......
  • Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 19 Noviembre 2003
    ...table. These cases are in sharp contrast with those arising out of escape from a domestic water supply (such as Carstairs v Taylor (1871) LR 6 Exch 217, Ross v Fedden (1872) 26 LT 966 or Anderson v Oppenheimer (1880) 5 QBD 602) which, although decided on other grounds, would seem to me to f......
  • Prosser (A.) & Son Ltd v Levy
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 31 Octubre 1955
    ...place where it has been brought with the consent or for the common benefit of both parties. I need refer to no more of the cases than Carstairs v. Taylor; Ross v. Feddon, and Cockburn v. Smith. It is now settled law that where the plaintiff and. The defendant occupy parts of the same buildi......
  • Gore v Stannard (trading as Wyvern Tyres)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 Octubre 2012
    ... ... These cases are in sharp contrast with those arising out of escape from a domestic water supply (such as Carstairs v Taylor (1871) LR 6 Ex 217 , Ross v Fedden (1872) 26 LT 966 or Anderson v Oppenheimer (1880) 5 QBD 602 ) which, although decided on other ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Mr Fletcher as the Quintessential Nigerian: Could a More In-Depth Analysis of the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher Reveala Uniquely Nigerian Tort?
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Comparative Law in Africa No. , August 2019
    • 16 Agosto 2019
    ...E Gamra & N Osunde [1957] WRNLR 182;McNeil, JL & Rains, R (1965) Nigerian Cases and Statutes on Contract and Tort301.4Carstairs v Taylor(1871) LR 6 Ex 217, 221; Nicholls v Marsland (1876) LR 6 Ex D1; Greenock Corp v Caledonian Ry [1917]AC 556 — these defences were approved bythe Nigerian Su......
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1971 Preliminary Sections
    • 14 Noviembre 2022
    ...1 Q.B.445. • • . . . . . • . 43 Carpenter v. Ebblewhite (1939) 1 K.B. 347; 119381 4 All E.R.41. . • . . .264 Carstairs v. Taylor, (1871) L.R. 6 Ex. 217. . . ........ . . • . . 299 • . . . . 44 Chandless - Chandless v. Nicholson (1942) 2 K.B. 321 at 324. . Cheko V. Kano N.A., High Court of N......
  • Rylands v. Fletcher Revitalised
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. II-1999, January 1999
    • 1 Enero 1999
    ...Rickards v. Lothian [1913] AC 263. 30 bid., at 280. Emphasis added. 31 ibid. 32 Rylands v. Fletcher, supra, fn 1. 33 Carstairs v. Taylor LR 6 Ex 217 (1871). 34 Imperial Tobacco v. Hart 51 NSR 379 (1917). "McDonnell v. Turf Development Board 78 (1944) ILTR 94, at 95. 36 Ibid. 37 Collingwood ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT